Boxing Risk • The Aftermath
There's an high risk in Boxing as will all know, it's only always serious if it's not detected so very early making the injury very risky for any boxer. We have had some boxing great sufferd at the expense of boxing. Source There is a rule in boxing that is very easy to avoid, since there is no guard or basic punch that is directed to that area. I mean the bumps in the never, the rabbit bumps. There have been comments about rabbit blows in the Valdez-Berchelt fight, and although I believe that this was not something decisive in the fight, it is a very important lack of professionalism to continue observing this type of blows at this stage of professionalism, in a championship fight. Valdez's punches were long after the boxers clash moment. Avoidable, unnecessary and also intentional. The result of Prichard Colon should be sufficient antecedent for this blow to be severely penalized when witnessing a boxer using it. Boxers have to fear throwing these kinds of accidental punches, but that is rarely the case. I think there is a negative effect on the strategy of the boxer who receives this blow. Beyond brain damage and the probability of contusions, the athlete who receives this blow will be worried, disoriented and attentive not to receive more of this punishment. So the boxer seeks his own health more than strategy, and in this way he loses an important balance in the fight. Unfair disadvantages that must have very little tolerance. It is a very simple blow and with a great destructive probability at the same time. That a boxer does it at this point is a deficiency in his discipline as a fighter, as he seeks to injure and cheat his rival. With less tolerance for these actions, harsh punishments and rules that are respected, it is easier to trust that these events will not happen again, much less in professional leagues. I honestly don't know what Terrel Williams thought when he hit Puerto Rican Prichard Colon like that. I don't think it's bad, but I don't know what Valdez thought when doing it against Bertchelt, if he hurt him or not, it doesn't matter, the blow is still there, and I repeat: it was a very easy avoidable situation, to the point of unnecessary. Another attitude is that of the "Alacrán" coach, Alfredo Caballero. In the break of what would be the next to last assault, Miguel Bertchelt expresses in words that he had spoiled the fight. If it were another fight, he would say that you just have to make an adjustment in the boxer's motivation, taking advantage of the break to exercise the necessary advice. But the Mexican champion came from going through very tough rounds, with knockdowns and a head damaged by Valdez's wild cross, without always ruling out some probability of damage due to rabbit blows. It was a fight in which he gave everything to throw in the towel, there was nothing to risk. The back of the neck is a fragile and red area in boxing, all that is needed is the blow in the wrong place, regardless of the force exerted. A coach must always guarantee the health of his fighter. Helping sports is also annoying networks and spreading the rejection, no matter how minimal, of these actions. Continue raising awareness, no matter how mild the case may be.
Boxing Risk • The Aftermath
There's an high risk in Boxing as will all know, it's only always serious if it's not detected so very early making the injury very risky for any boxer. We have had some boxing great sufferd at the expense of boxing. Source There is a rule in boxing that is very easy to avoid, since there is no guard or basic punch that is directed to that area. I mean the bumps in the never, the rabbit bumps. There have been comments about rabbit blows in the Valdez-Berchelt fight, and although I believe that this was not something decisive in the fight, it is a very important lack of professionalism to continue observing this type of blows at this stage of professionalism, in a championship fight. Valdez's punches were long after the boxers clash moment. Avoidable, unnecessary and also intentional. The result of Prichard Colon should be sufficient antecedent for this blow to be severely penalized when witnessing a boxer using it. Boxers have to fear throwing these kinds of accidental punches, but that is rarely the case. I think there is a negative effect on the strategy of the boxer who receives this blow. Beyond brain damage and the probability of contusions, the athlete who receives this blow will be worried, disoriented and attentive not to receive more of this punishment. So the boxer seeks his own health more than strategy, and in this way he loses an important balance in the fight. Unfair disadvantages that must have very little tolerance. It is a very simple blow and with a great destructive probability at the same time. That a boxer does it at this point is a deficiency in his discipline as a fighter, as he seeks to injure and cheat his rival. With less tolerance for these actions, harsh punishments and rules that are respected, it is easier to trust that these events will not happen again, much less in professional leagues. I honestly don't know what Terrel Williams thought when he hit Puerto Rican Prichard Colon like that. I don't think it's bad, but I don't know what Valdez thought when doing it against Bertchelt, if he hurt him or not, it doesn't matter, the blow is still there, and I repeat: it was a very easy avoidable situation, to the point of unnecessary. Another attitude is that of the "Alacrán" coach, Alfredo Caballero. In the break of what would be the next to last assault, Miguel Bertchelt expresses in words that he had spoiled the fight. If it were another fight, he would say that you just have to make an adjustment in the boxer's motivation, taking advantage of the break to exercise the necessary advice. But the Mexican champion came from going through very tough rounds, with knockdowns and a head damaged by Valdez's wild cross, without always ruling out some probability of damage due to rabbit blows. It was a fight in which he gave everything to throw in the towel, there was nothing to risk. The back of the neck is a fragile and red area in boxing, all that is needed is the blow in the wrong place, regardless of the force exerted. A coach must always guarantee the health of his fighter. Helping sports is also annoying networks and spreading the rejection, no matter how minimal, of these actions. Continue raising awareness, no matter how mild the case may be.
Boxing Risk • The Aftermath
There's an high risk in Boxing as will all know, it's only always serious if it's not detected so very early making the injury very risky for any boxer. We have had some boxing great sufferd at the expense of boxing. Source There is a rule in boxing that is very easy to avoid, since there is no guard or basic punch that is directed to that area. I mean the bumps in the never, the rabbit bumps. There have been comments about rabbit blows in the Valdez-Berchelt fight, and although I believe that this was not something decisive in the fight, it is a very important lack of professionalism to continue observing this type of blows at this stage of professionalism, in a championship fight. Valdez's punches were long after the boxers clash moment. Avoidable, unnecessary and also intentional. The result of Prichard Colon should be sufficient antecedent for this blow to be severely penalized when witnessing a boxer using it. Boxers have to fear throwing these kinds of accidental punches, but that is rarely the case. I think there is a negative effect on the strategy of the boxer who receives this blow. Beyond brain damage and the probability of contusions, the athlete who receives this blow will be worried, disoriented and attentive not to receive more of this punishment. So the boxer seeks his own health more than strategy, and in this way he loses an important balance in the fight. Unfair disadvantages that must have very little tolerance. It is a very simple blow and with a great destructive probability at the same time. That a boxer does it at this point is a deficiency in his discipline as a fighter, as he seeks to injure and cheat his rival. With less tolerance for these actions, harsh punishments and rules that are respected, it is easier to trust that these events will not happen again, much less in professional leagues. I honestly don't know what Terrel Williams thought when he hit Puerto Rican Prichard Colon like that. I don't think it's bad, but I don't know what Valdez thought when doing it against Bertchelt, if he hurt him or not, it doesn't matter, the blow is still there, and I repeat: it was a very easy avoidable situation, to the point of unnecessary. Another attitude is that of the "Alacrán" coach, Alfredo Caballero. In the break of what would be the next to last assault, Miguel Bertchelt expresses in words that he had spoiled the fight. If it were another fight, he would say that you just have to make an adjustment in the boxer's motivation, taking advantage of the break to exercise the necessary advice. But the Mexican champion came from going through very tough rounds, with knockdowns and a head damaged by Valdez's wild cross, without always ruling out some probability of damage due to rabbit blows. It was a fight in which he gave everything to throw in the towel, there was nothing to risk. The back of the neck is a fragile and red area in boxing, all that is needed is the blow in the wrong place, regardless of the force exerted. A coach must always guarantee the health of his fighter. Helping sports is also annoying networks and spreading the rejection, no matter how minimal, of these actions. Continue raising awareness, no matter how mild the case may be.